To ensure an optimal and secure experience, please upgrade to the latest version of your browser.
According to David Leduc, head of fixed income at Mellon, the question is an important one – but one that warrants a multifaceted answer. One reason, he says, is because negative rates in the US could undo post-Great Financial Crisis efforts to make banks more resilient to future shocks.
“Fed Chairman Jerome Powell has repeatedly highlighted the challenges of negative interest rates, including the impact on bank margins and profitability as it would be difficult to pass on these rates to depositors,” he says. “It also could encourage banks to pursue riskier lending activities, creating further risks and distorting markets.”
This is partially why Sweden’s central bank abandoned its negative rate policy at the end of 2019, after almost five years,2 he says. The Fed may also be reluctant because it could upset money markets, which, Leduc says, play a more prominent role in the US than in other large developed economies. “A contraction in the availability of investors in money markets would have negative implications for corporate borrowers and investors such as pension funds,” he says.
While additional reasons also exist, the picture becomes clearer when considering the variety of tools at the Fed’s disposal. Remember how it responded when the ‘black swan’ of Covid-19 descended upon bond markets earlier this year? It created nine lending and purchase programs to restore liquidity after credit markets froze. And as economic lockdowns put pressure on the natural flow of capital, the Fed used its Main Street Lending program to make it easier for small businesses and non-profit institutions to access credit.
Since the start of the crisis, the Fed’s balance sheet has ballooned from US$4trn to more than US$7trn3 — and while that’s a steep increase, it still has room to grow, according to Leduc. “On average, the Fed has tweaked its existing facilities at least once a week since they’ve been implemented, mostly expanding their scope and lengthening their duration,” he says. “Powell has noted problems with non-profits like hospitals and universities and is planning to do more for them.”
Then why is it still a topic of discussion?
While it’s unlikely the US will see negative rates in the foreseeable future, Leduc says, he understands the rationale as to why they might work. “They’re designed to increase economic activity by stimulating lending activity and reducing borrowing costs,” he says. “In theory, this would also contribute to a weakening US dollar, which would have several benefits to global growth, helping developing economies reduce their cost of servicing dollar-denominated debt.”
However, even for central banks that currently have negative rates, he and his team do not expect further cuts for now. The ECB hasn’t touched its deposit rate since September 2019, instead opting for other tools, like quantitative easing (QE) and reducing capital requirements for banks.4 Similarly the BoJ has shied away from lowering its policy rate, instead focusing on the expansion of its programs to support the availability of credit. In May, the BoJ announced a new program to support bank lending to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) which expands on existing programs to facilitate large purchases of corporate debt, ETFs and other assets, he says.
While the Fed’s counterparts have decided not to cut rates further in the near term, how is Leduc and the BNY Mellon Global Fixed Income team navigating an environment full of central bank loans and asset purchases?
Due to pandemic-driven market dislocations in March and April, corporate and high yield bonds dramatically underperformed government bonds as rates fell back and risk premiums skyrocketed, Leduc says. As policy responses materialized, he’s increased allocations to highquality issuers in sectors least impacted by Covid-19.
“We were able to take advantage of higher spreads in the new issue market as companies rushed to raise liquidity with new bond issues,” he says “While we increased our overall exposure, we have been careful to maintain a high level of portfolio diversification in an environment where idiosyncratic risks have only increased.”
Despite US policy rates approaching similar levels to those of Europe and Japan, he says US bonds, in both spread and overall yields, remain attractive in comparison—but adds the US isn’t the only place to invest in bonds. “We also continue to find attractive opportunities outside the US, specifically in peripheral European government debt and select higher-quality emerging markets,” he says.
He admits this is a different approach than if the Fed had implemented negative rates. If it did— then over the short term—the demand for higher yielding assets in US corporate bond markets would increase, prompting him and the team to increase allocation to those sectors, he says. But over the medium term, it could potentially create risks in sectors, such as banks, and distort financial market pricing, prompting him and the team to reconsider asset exposure and overall risk budgets, he adds.
However, this is not the case… at least for now. That said, how long can we expect this environment to persist before the Fed can actually raise rates again?
Easy does it
Most agree the pandemic will determine both the severity and duration of the crisis. While some expect a reversion to normality soon and some think it’s more of a long-term probability, the truth may lie somewhere in between.
“We expect growth to recover meaningfully in 2021 based on an expectation of the economy reopening. However, we also expect the impact of the crisis to continue to result in lower trend output over the next several years,” he says. “As a result, we think the Fed will remain in an extremely accommodative stance well into 2021 with the potential for policy to begin normalizing in 2022.”
1 Business Insider: Trump renews call for negative interest rates, says other countries are already enjoying the 'gift'. May 12, 2020.
2 WSJ: A Pioneer of Negative Rates Pauses the Experiment. December 19, 2019.
3 Federal Reserve: Credit and Liquidity Programs and the Balance Sheet. Accessed June 18, 2020.
4 Reuters: ECB cuts banks' market risk-related capital requirements. April 16, 2020.
Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of a mutual fund carefully before investing. Contact a financial advisor or visit im.bnymellon.com to obtain a prospectus, or summary prospectus, if available, that contains this and other information about the fund, and read it carefully before investing.
Bonds are subject to interest rate, credit, liquidity, call and market risks, to varying degrees. Generally, all other factors being equal, bond prices are inversely related to interest-rate changes and rate increases can cause price declines. Currencies are can decline in value relative to a local currency, or, in the case of hedged positions, the local currency will decline relative to the currency being hedged. These risks may increase fund volatility. Management risk is the risk that the investment techniques and risk analyses applied will not produce the desired results and that certain policies or developments may affect the investment techniques available to managing certain strategies. Investing in foreign denominated and/or domiciled securities involves special risks, including changes in currency exchange rates, political, economic, and social instability, limited company information, differing auditing and legal standards, and less market liquidity. These risks generally are greater with emerging market countries.
Municipal income may be subject to state and local taxes for out-of-state residents. Some income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for certain investors. Capital gains, if any, are taxable. Mellon is a global multi-specialist investment manager dedicated to serving our clients with a full spectrum of research-driven solutions. Mellon Investments Corporation (Mellon) is a registered investment adviser and an indirect subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation.
BNY Mellon Investment Management is one of the world’s leading investment management organizations and one of the top U.S. wealth managers, encompassing BNY Mellon’s affiliated investment management firms, wealth management organization and global distribution companies. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and may also be used as a generic term to reference the Corporation as a whole or its various subsidiaries generally.
Views expressed are those of the manager stated and do not reflect views of other managers or the firm overall. Views are current as of the date of this publication and subject to change. This information contains projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. There is no assurance that such events or expectations will be achieved, and actual results may be significantly different from that shown here. The information is based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons.
Forecasts, estimates and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Certain information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. Please consult a legal, tax or financial professional in order to determine whether an investment product or service is appropriate for a particular situation. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. BNY Mellon Investment Advisor, Inc., Mellon and BNY Mellon Securities Corporation are subsidiaries of BNY Mellon. 2020 BNY Mellon Securities Corporation, distributor, 240 Greenwich St, New York, NY 10286