Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Emerging market equities: Is there opportunity?

  • Tweet
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share via email
  • Print
  • Download

February 2023

After a prolonged period of relative underperformance, could emerging market (EM) equities be set for a renaissance? Here, Newton portfolio manager Ian Smith shares important factors EM investors may want to consider when assessing companies.


  • We believe EM equities may be at an inflection point for a period of sustained outperformance relative to their developed peers.
  • The mid to long-term trajectory of the US dollar is likely to have a key bearing on the performance of EM equities over the next few months and years.
  • Our view is that important components of the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index have already experienced a meaningful correction over the last few years, at least until a few months ago.
  • We believe it is crucial for long-term EM investors to focus on three factors when assessing companies for investment: governance standards, business franchise strength, and growth-outlook resiliency.

Emerging-market equities had a good end to 2022. The MSCI EM Index was up +13.3% in US-dollar terms in the last two months of the year, outperforming the S&P 500 and MSCI World indices by 13.8% and 10.8% respectively.1

In fact, the MSCI EM Index only marginally underperformed these other indices across the whole of 2022, which strikes us as counter to general perception in a year when China was touted as ‘uninvestible’ and Russian equity holdings were written down to zero. EM equities have also begun 2023 in robust fashion.

EM equities have been a laggard for so long that these bursts of strong relative performance naturally beg the question: are we at an inflection point, and are we now set for a sustained period of EM outperformance?

Inflection point
For us, the last potentially comparable inflection point was almost 12 years ago. Between October 2010 and October 2022, the MSCI EM Index returned a meagre 6.9% in US-dollar terms, or 0.6% annualized. This trailed the S&P 500 and MSCI World indices by 308% and 173% respectively, over the same period.2 We have not seen an outperformance or underperformance cycle of this duration since the MSCI EM Index was created, and the scale of the underperformance relative to the S&P 500 reached its widest extremity in October 2022.

Furthermore, the relative discount of the MSCI EM Index is also at historically elevated levels. As of December 2022, it trades at a cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio of 10.4 times, versus 24 times for the S&P 500 (see chart below). It is hardly surprising that many market participants would start to consider an inflection point in favor of EMs.

The role of currency in relative performance of EM equities
Currency moves are, of course, important for the performance of EM equities. JP Morgan’s EM Currency Index fell by 55% from its peak in May 2011 to its trough in October 2022, or by 6.8% on an annualized basis.3 Hence, currency moves will account for a meaningful component of the MSCI EM Index’s underperformance in dollar terms during this time frame. But aside from a simple currency translation standpoint, we believe that pronounced local-currency weakness against the dollar can also bring risks to economic progress, corporate earnings and balance sheets in EMs. The strains of such currency weakness can be felt through inflation passthrough (and related tightening monetary policy responses), as well as through financial strains felt by institutions encumbered with dollar-based debt and liabilities.

And so, for us, the outlook for EM equities is likely to be meaningfully influenced by the outlook for the US dollar. We can see the four distinct periods of relative performance for EMs since 1987 (two periods each of outperformance and underperformance) have been characterized by either a benign or weak dollar.

Lack of consensus on the dollar’s long-term trajectory
The smartest brains in global capital markets will always struggle to find a consensus around what might cause a secular dollar bull or bear market. Do we need a policy catalyst, such as 1985’s Plaza Accord?4 Can we assume that purchasing power parity (PPP) conversion factors will trend towards 1.0 over the longer term in developing countries that are making genuine progress? Would structurally higher inflation in the US, versus major EM countries, be a game-changer for currencies? Are the monetary experiments since the global financial crisis of 2008 of any relevance to the currency outlook?

We are not sure, but we do think it pertinent to note the large twin deficit (current account and fiscal deficit combined) in recent years in the US, the custodian of the world’s reserve currency. This deficit almost reached 17% of GDP through the Covid-19 years of 2020-2021, versus typically around 5-7% in the seven years prior to this, and the current 5.4% for 2022.5 Are these imbalances bullish for EM currencies, or physical assets, or potentially even both?

What will shift the needle in the EM index?
China is clearly a very important EM index constituent, composing roughly one third of the MSCI EM Index at the end of 2022. More broadly, the three North Asia regions of China, Taiwan and Korea, plus India, comprise a dominant 72% of the index, and it is therefore hard to see strong EM performance without most of these regions positively contributing.

It is also worth noting that EM equities are not the play on commodities that many think them to be. There are several standout resource-intensive economies in EMs; however, these four Asian regions, which comprise almost three quarters of the index, are predominantly commodity and energy importers.

From the perspective of sectors, technology and financials together represent over half of the MSCI EM Index. China’s online businesses are also key – we estimate that they represent close to 15% of the index. So, in the same way as we note the importance of those economies above, it is hard for the asset class to work well without technology, financials and China online businesses also performing.

We believe the allure here is in the fact that many of these important components of the EM index have already experienced a meaningful correction over the last few years, at least until a few months ago.

The short-term variables that preoccupy market participants
From a tactical perspective, perhaps looking 12 months out, our view is that relatively low valuations and beaten-up stocks alone do not guarantee strong performance. However, there are some potential catalysts for EM equities that have started to play out in recent months:

  • US consumer price inflation (CPI) has probably peaked, with headline CPI down from a high of 9.1% in June to 6.5% in December. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve (Fed) appears to be set to raise rates further, it has already done a lot – raising the upper band from 0.25% to 4.5%, with some estimating that rates may peak at 5.1%.6 As the global macro slowdown finally starts to catch up with the US, during the final throes of Fed rate hikes, it is certainly plausible that market participants gain further conviction in a scenario where both the US dollar and US interest rates face sustainable downward pressure. This is usually a positive setup for EM equities. Both the US yield curve and the dollar have already been drifting lower in recent months, as we potentially move past peak rate expectations. Of course, it is far from clear whether US CPI can fall to and/or stabilize around the 2% targeted level; however, the stance that inflation remains stubbornly stuck above 2% strikes us as an already consensual point of view.
  • EM countries are broadly ahead of the curve in this inflation cycle – almost every major EM region either has well-anchored low inflation or positive real rates (those few with higher inflation and negative real rates at least have higher real rates than the US). Granted, some countries, like Turkey, are experiencing dramatic unanchored inflation, but they do not represent meaningful parts of the index.
  • Chinese government policy has clearly pivoted towards: I) reopening, versus strict Covid-19 containment; II) supporting the real-estate industry, versus targeted industry rationalization; and III) supporting economic growth, versus addressing societal imbalances through a regulatory agenda against large companies. This pivot has become more obvious over the last few months, perhaps most notably on Boxing Day 2022, when China announced that, from 8 January, it would be scrapping quarantine requirements for those arriving from abroad, as well as for infected people domestically. The next few months in China will be difficult, with questions around whether the fragile real-estate industry can be rehabilitated, and with little signs yet of economic recovery. Furthermore, President Xi Jinping will not have permanently given up on his ambitions around addressing social tensions, nor reunification of Taiwan for that matter. Systemic mishaps can still occur in China’s imbalanced economy. However, the case remains clear to us that the near-term outlook has enormously improved following a clear policy pivot from the government.

What do we know?
We would suggest that readers treat our musings and constructive outlook for EM equities in 2023 with a good dose of skepticism. This is not just because we are preaching the same asset class that we manage, nor because we purport to be stock pickers with a long-term investment horizon, as opposed to tactical strategists, but mainly because it is very hard to get these year-by-year allocation calls right. We can see that relatively low valuations in EMs have now been met by potential catalysts in the form of a weaker dollar and better growth in China. However, we also appreciate that there are a multitude of variables that can undermine this rosy picture.

So, what do we believe with high conviction, then?

First, we think that EM equities are a worthwhile strategic allocation. EM and frontier countries account for two thirds of the world’s population, and a higher proportion of the world’s younger population. The 20 biggest emerging markets account for 34% of the world’s nominal GDP, a figure which is growing, and around 46% of the world’s PPP-adjusted GDP7, which is a better reflection of the real volume of economic activity. Yet they encompass well under 10% of global capital allocations. EM and frontier countries account for around two thirds of global CO2 emissions8, and rising, so will be the necessary home for the majority of future energy-transition investments. For us, it is only in EMs that you can find such a range of opportunities, namely:

  • The unparalleled ingredients for improving prosperity and a growing middle class in countries like India and Indonesia 
  • The rich natural-resource endowments in regions like Latin America, the Middle East and North Africa 
  • The scale of continuing change in a mega economy like China’s 
  • The technology leadership from innovative companies in key strategic industries, especially in North Asia.

Secondly, we believe investors in EMs should tread with caution and a long-term mindset. We anticipate that winning companies will win by an extremely wide margin, especially in EMs. This is because many growth opportunities are still in their nascency, the cost of capital is high and volatile, economic cycles are more abrupt, and governance-related pitfalls are more common. For an investor committing capital to the region, we believe it is important to try to get the right side of these variables more often than not. It is impossible for an investor, or even a CEO, to know all the ins and outs of any portfolio company. In acceptance of this inevitable knowledge deficiency, we believe it is crucial to look at investment opportunities through an appropriate lens. For us, this means a focus on the following criteria:

  • Governance standards: to ensure an alignment of interest with corporate decision-makers that we believe to be of high caliber in relation to their competence, vision and integrity
  • Business franchise strength: we want to see a logical relationship between qualitative company attributes and quantitative financial outcomes, which, in turn, can provide comfort around the sustainability of healthy returns on invested capital
  • Growth-outlook resiliency: this can be achieved through a deep understanding of durable secular trends (or themes) to seek to ensure that portfolio companies may enjoy tailwinds, as opposed to persistent growth headwinds that often induce unexpected (yet predictable) disappointments.

We use this lens to try to unearth what we believe to be the most likely winners: if you can identify those EM winners, and can buy them at a good price, we believe that you then need a sufficient investment horizon to allow those winners adequate time to pull away from their peers and for the market to fully recognize their achievements.


The MSCI Emerging Markets Index (net of foreign withholding taxes) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index designed to measure the equity performance in the global emerging markets. The index consists of 23 MSCI emerging market national indices. 

The MSCI World Index is a free float-adjusted, market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, including the United States, Canada, Australia, Europe, New Zealand and the Far East.

The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) Composite Stock Price Index is a widely accepted, unmanaged index of U.S. stock market performance. 



1 FactSet, December 31, 2022. 

2 FactSet, December 31, 2022.

3 FactSet, December 31, 2022. 

4 The 1985 Plaza Accord saw the G5 nations of Germany, France, UK, US and Japan agree to manipulate exchange rates to depreciate the value of the US dollar versus the Japanese yen and German mark.

5 Accessed January 2023. 

6 CNBC. The fed projects raising rates as high as 5.1% before ending inflation battle. December 14, 2022

7 Miles to go: the future of emerging markets. June 2021. 

8 Global Energy Review 2021. April 2021.



All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of principal. Certain investments involve greater or unique risks that should be considered along with the objectives, fees, and expenses before investing.

An investor may not invest directly in any index.

“Newton” and/or the “Newton Investment Management” brand refers to the following group of affiliated companies: Newton Investment Management Limited (NIM) and Newton Investment Management North America LLC (NIMNA). NIM is incorporated in the United Kingdom (Registered in England no. 1371973) and is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the conduct of investment business. Both Newton firms are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States of America as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Newton is a subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Newton’s investment advisory businesses are described in their Form ADVs, Part 1 and 2, which can be obtained from the website or obtained upon request.

BNY Mellon Investment Management is one of the world’s leading investment management organizations, encompassing BNY Mellon’s affiliated investment management firms and global distribution companies. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and may also be used as a generic term to reference the corporation as a whole or its various subsidiaries generally. 

Recent market risks include pandemic risks related to COVID-19. The effects of COVID-19 have contributed to increased volatility in global markets and will likely affect certain countries, companies, industries and market sectors more dramatically than others.

This material has been provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular investment product, strategy, investment manager or account arrangement, and should not serve as a primary basis for investment decisions. Prospective investors should consult a legal, tax or financial professional in order to determine whether any investment product, strategy or service is appropriate for their particular circumstances. Views expressed are those of the author stated and do not reflect views of other managers or the firm overall. Views are current as of the date of this publication and subject to change. 

The information is based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. References to specific securities, asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be and should not be interpreted as recommendations. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Not FDIC-Insured | No Bank Guarantee | May Lose Value 

© 2023 BNY Mellon Securities Corporation, distributor, 240 Greenwich Street, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10286