Covid-19: Looking through the crisis

  • Tweet
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share via email
  • Print
  • Download

March 18, 2020

By Paul Brain, head of fixed income, Newton Investment Management

Once we know that all major economies are in lockdown, we may be able to start calculating the extent of the economic damage wreaked on companies by Covid-19. At that point too, we may finally be able to start ‘looking through’ the human tragedy that is unfolding to make some assumptions about the economic cost of the crisis.

Meanwhile, the authorities are going to do ‘whatever it takes’ just as they pledged in 2008. In our view they may not succeed, but they will keep on trying until it works.

We have been suggesting for a while that once central banks have used up all their monetary policy tools governments are increasingly likely to use fiscal policy measures such as tax breaks, company bailouts, nationalization and even helicopter money, and we are now seeing it via a succession of global leaders pledging financial support packages and to do ‘whatever it takes’ to shore up battered economies.

This reminds me of the situation that governments find themselves in during wartime periods, so it is worth taking a look at so-called ‘wartime financing’.

Budget deficits of 10% are not unusual

In wartime periods, budget deficits of 10% are not unusual. During the global financial crisis, we had similar increases in debt levels and we didn’t advocate selling government bonds because a financial crisis would take decades to unwind. This scenario requires the long-term maintenance of low borrowing costs, or ‘financial repression’ as we now call it. This time around, it is possible that the economic shock could be past its worse in a couple of months (even though defaults will still be high) and once started, fiscal policy will be difficult to reign in.

By contrast, central bank emergency rate cuts can be reversed quickly once the crisis is past. At such a point, we would expect to see rising rates and increased government debt, which should lead to rising yields.

Turning back to the present, two weeks ago (the week ended on March 6) we saw a sell-off in inflation-linked assets and credit due to the beginnings of an oil price war. This had the effect of undermining US Treasury inflation-protected security (TIPS) bonds.

For fixed-income markets, the worst-hit asset class this week (March 16 to March 18) is the high-yield market – especially high-yield energy bonds. Energy high-yield issues were not the only ones affected, all high-yield bond prices have declined together. As such, we believe it is prudent for bond investors to constantly monitor the cash-flow situation of their credit issues.

Yen to offer support?

All bond markets have been down this week (from March 16 to March 18). Some of the ‘on the run’ government bonds have been more stable, but the majority of government bond issues have underperformed.

Short-dated government securities have benefitted from a decline in cash rates but with government yield curves steepening, the remainder are down in price. In the current environment, we would anticipate that yen currency exposure might start to offer some support to bond investors, along with selective short positions in emerging-market currencies.

One consideration for investors may be to increase government-bond duration and buying longer-dated US Treasuries, with an eye to reducing that duration as the full extent of the crisis feeds into markets. Raising cash levels to ensure there is no need to trade due to collateral calls and thin flows also seems sensible to us. Liquidity in the bond markets is currently extremely poor, and bid-to-offer spreads are wide, so we believe now is a time to keep trading to a minimum.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of principal. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Portfolio composition and allocation are subject to change at any time.


Bonds are subject to interest rate, credit, liquidity, call and market risks, to varying degrees. Generally, all other factors being equal, bond prices are inversely related to interest-rate changes and rate increases can cause price declines. High yield bonds involve increased credit and liquidity risk than higher rated bonds and are considered speculative in terms of the issuer’s ability to pay interest and repay principal on a timely basis. Inflation-linked bonds (ILBs) issued by a government are fixed-income securities whose principal value is periodically adjusted according to the rate of inflation; ILBs decline in value when real interest rates rise. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are ILBs issued by the U.S. Government. Currencies are can decline in value relative to a local currency, or, in the case of hedged positions, the local currency will decline relative to the currency being hedged. These risks may increase fund volatility. Investing in foreign denominated and/or domiciled securities involves special risks, including changes in currency exchange rates, political, economic, and social instability, limited company information, differing auditing and legal standards, and less market liquidity. These risks generally are greater with emerging market countries.

Diversification cannot assure a profit or protect against loss.

Newton” and/or the “Newton Investment Management” brand refers to Newton Investment Management Limited. Newton is incorporated in the United Kingdom and is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the conduct of investment business. Newton is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an investment adviser. Newton is a subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation.

BNY Mellon Investment Management is one of the world’s leading investment management organizations and one of the top U.S. wealth managers, encompassing BNY Mellon’s affiliated investment management firms, wealth management organization and global distribution companies. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and may also be used as a generic term to reference the corporation as a whole or its various subsidiaries generally.

Views expressed are those of the manager stated and do not reflect views of other managers or the firm overall. This information contains projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. There is no assurance that such events or expectations will be achieved, and actual results may be significantly different from that shown here. The information in this presentation is based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons.

Forecasts, estimates and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. Please consult a legal, tax or investment advisor in order to determine whether an investment product or service is appropriate for a particular situation. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. BNY Mellon Investment Adviser, Inc., Newton and BNY Mellon Securities Corporation are subsidiaries of BNY Mellon.

Not FDIC-Insured | No Bank Guarantee | May Lose Value